Andrea Salinas helped Oregon Egalitarians muscle through a favorable new congressional chart this fall as the president of her state House's redistricting commission.
Also, just weeks latterly, she declared a run for one of the new seats she helped produce — an initiative that didn't go unnoticed.
"What I know about Oregonians, they like fairness. And they like it when their tagged leaders and their public officers are fair," said Loretta Smith, a former county manager and Salinas' opponent in the Popular primary for Oregon's 6th Congressional District."People do not like bigwig trading, right?"
.It's a quip of the decennial redistricting season State lawmakers, in charge of drawing new charts, can draw a quarter for themselves or their musketeers. The process is formerly innately tone-interested — lawgivers routinely draw charts for the benefit of their party — but in some cases, these politicians are working in their nonfictional tone- interest.
Read more: PowerLine Blog Is An American Political Blog
Besides Oregon, the chair of the commission assigned with Ohio's redistricting is now grueling Popular Rep. Marcy Kaptur. And in Missouri, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, state lawgivers on redistricting panels are also considering runs for Congress under charts they've or could help craft.
Similar moves can goad allegations of foul play from political rivals, and don’t always work out as anticipated, especially in a cycle where the process has earned further attention from anti-gerrymandering lawyers. And with further scrutiny than ever on the formerly-obscure redistricting process, these acts are conceivably getting harder to pull off.
Maybe the most brazen-faced illustration of tone-creation fell flat in western North Carolina, where GOP mapmakers drew a new quarter to include the home of the state House speaker only to sleep. Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.) declare a shot for it. And in Pennsylvania, Egalitarians flew into delirium when a state assemblyman in their party tried to cut a deal with Republicans to produce an open seat within his political base in the Philadelphia area.
"That is the kind of conflict of interest we all have to be apprehensive of," said. Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.)."We can not tone-deal by way of a chart."
"We can not be involved in that," she said."That is not who we should be as a party that believes in good governance."
Every state has its own, frequently complex, redistricting conditions. State lawmakers need a convergence of effects to go right to end up in Congress. But maybe no bone seems more poised than Salinas in Oregon, where the redistricting was particularly contentious.
State House Speaker Tina Kotek reneged on a pledge to give House Republicans prescription power over the redistricting maps. The result was a grudging concession after a tumultuous prejudiced brawl and a strike from angry Democratic lawgivers, with Salinas getting her chance to run in the new, heavily Popular quarter she helped create.
Salinas’ crusade originally agreed to make the seeker available for an interview with POLITICO but declined after learning the focus of the story, citing a scheduling conflict. Shannon Geison, a crusade prophet, latterly transferred a statement.
“ Andrea forcefully believes that legislative seats don’t belong to lawmakers, but their ingredients,” Geison said. “ The commission’s commitment was to the people of Oregon — not to any sitting Solon, Andrea included — and the charts reflect that.”